Moderator: Committee

loadswine wrote:Just a little question: you don't mention any new gaskets or seals , did you replace them as a matter of course or was it not needed.
dsr wrote:sorry to be simple but i thought that the cats were on the exhaust side of the engine not on the intake side so how does the pre cat break up get into the inlet side and go into the bores and damage them.
mrsmr2 wrote:Worrying reading for someone thinking of buying a new one.
Do we have any experience of Toyota's reaction if the pre cats were showing degradation during the warranty period?
My concern is if I do 20k miles in years 1 and 2, and the pre-cats start breaking up, the engine would probably go after the warranty period. Would Toyota act during the warranty period (replacing the pre-cats) or would they refuse to accept it as a problem?
Perry190 wrote: The Definition of RICE - looks like they covered their motas with glue and ram raided halfords
mrsmr2 wrote:It's seems that the only way to truly check is to remove the exhaust.
Therefore, if Toyota found out someone had been removing and checking the pre cat on regular basis, would they pass the blame on - a la "I think you must have dropped it sir", or would they be reasonable about it?

Tomr2 wrote:just noticed on that spyderchat thread that some guy is on his FIFTH engine - talk about being unlucky!!
do you think it could be down to the lower octane fuel they use over there that's braking up the cats?
loadswine wrote:I checked on my precats yesterday and to my amazement! found that there was no sign of deterioration of the matrix visible. I had a really good look and was a little concerned at first when I saw that they were not completely flat across the surface and did ,in fact have a slightly dished shape in the central area. First I thought PANIC, but when I checked both sides I noticed that this shape seemed to be there on purpose to allow for the O2 sensors to sit close up to the surface of the honeycomb. Please tell me I'm right or my car has immediate surgery.
mr-s_turbo wrote:I'm sure that manifold i had looked like the pre cats were slightly dished, by this i mean the centre looked higher than the sides, convex rather than concave.(i think)
If you have mine yet, take a look at it and see can you?
victor wrote:As my 60,000 service is due soon, I booked the car in for the end of May whilst I was getting the summer tyre fitted today.
I asked about an end of warrenty inspection and an inspection of the pre-cats. The receptionist looked at me and said she would recommend getting rid of the pre-cats as it causes engine damage, and that they currently had an MR2 in with motor damage caused by the pre-cats.
I guess I will get them to do it during that service.

phil4 wrote:Interesting, but was it really a receptionist?
SteveJ wrote:
Can you smuggle a tape recorder in with you and get that on tape please
Tomr2 wrote:thats very good then if toyota have properley recognised the problem and are coming clean about it. would be nice if all dealerships offered 'free pre-cat removal' on all mk 3 2's even the ones out of warranty like mine
Tomr2 wrote:thats very good then if toyota have properley recognised the problem and are coming clean about it. would be nice if all dealerships offered 'free pre-cat removal' on all mk 3 2's even the ones out of warranty like mine
da monkey wrote:the monkey is now (pre) catless, MAF sensor cleaned and ECU reset - the 2 is now a different car![]()
just to say thanks for the write up and hey if a monkey can do it anyone can
Perry190 wrote: The Definition of RICE - looks like they covered their motas with glue and ram raided halfords
Return to Maintenance, Problems & Troubleshooting
Users browsing this forum: AnDr0iD666, grsymons and 2 guests