Dyno Results from teh 25th November Dyno Extravaganza

[firepower]

can't wait   s:) s:)  

so when did you decide to have the tte turbo and sp exhaust fitted   s:?: :?: s:?:

[muffdan]

about this time last year, but over the last 12 months I broke my leg, stopping me from driving and suffered another pre-cat failure on top of other various engine problems.

It was worth the wait though. Everyone should get a turbo, its fantastic and great fun surprising BMW's and hot-hatches when you destroy them on a bit of dual carriage way!   s:D s:D

[firepower]

yeah the turbo's fantastic , especialy when you have just dusted a hot hatch like a civic type r off your exhaust pipe and in to the weeds   s:lol: :lol: s:lol:  

how long did it take for sp to get your exhaust in stock   s:?: :?: s:?:

[muffdan]

Not sure, I booked my car in a week before the Dyno Day last month, but had to wait until this last week for them to have the time to install everything.

[firepower]

mmm  s:!: :!: s:!:   ordered mine 30th september , mat telephoned me on the 14th december , i paid for the system using credit card and thought i would have had delivery this week now told it will be in the new year

bad hold up , it will be a month at least since i paid in full before i get the system  s:evil: :evil: s:evil:

[muffdan]

That sucks, the wait must be killing you.

I did actually book my car in and ordered my parts around the beginning of August paying a deposit then but had to cancel due to a pre-cat failure taking my engine out. I rescheduled last month for everything except the turbo and down pipe because my replacement reconditioned engine was still having a few issues.

When they got the car, Matt did some tests and discovered the engine was actually fine and it was just a partially blocked main cat so we then went ahead with the works as originally planned.

Maybe you were earmarked for mine as we weren't expecting to be installing my exhaust system until the new year   s:oops: :oops: s:oops:

[firepower]

maybe , ah well i just hoped to be able to fit the system while off work over christmas  

a little bit miffed that i have paid in full and the system is'nt even ready for delivery  s:( s:(  

good to hear your car is running fine and can't wait now to get my exhaust system fitted  s:) s:)

[Anonymous]

hey firepower!!

dont forget to get it dyno'd then you can update your sig!

[firepower]

sure will mate  s:wink: :wink: s:wink:  when i get it

[1979scotte]

I shouldn't really be reviving this thread it's 11 years old  but I really don't think I've seen it before.

Very interesting reading having all those roadsters on the same Dyno at the same time and with some charts too.

I never knew the C2 kit was 12psi with big power and torque.

[lamcote]

It does suggest that for more naturally aspirated bolt on power, the exhaust is the best place to look.

[1979scotte]

It does suggest that for more naturally aspirated bolt on power, the exhaust is the best place to look.

Maybe not just for NA.
The 2 Hass kits put down very similar bhp but massively different torque.
Nigel's PE is making more bhp than the TTE turbos but less torque.
And talking about TTE turbos I can't believe those torque figures far higher than official.
Surely the different exhausts are involved there although I suppose general engine condition tyres and clutch could all be involved.

[Ardent]

been thinking again! ...

looking at the dyno results and other TTE dyno's, i wondered why that roughly on average the TTE turbo seems to be in the correct zone of BHP that was quoted origanally by TTE! yet nearly everyones torque figures seem to be well above what TTE say it should have been!

i wonder why this is?

Scott
Resurrected or not, good find. Never seen before.
Had to go back and read from the top.
The post I've quoted seems to echo your thoughts and my observations. Bhp in the right area. Torque above quoted. Interesting.
If that is the same Spit. Well played sir.

[1979scotte]

been thinking again! ...

looking at the dyno results and other TTE dyno's, i wondered why that roughly on average the TTE turbo seems to be in the correct zone of BHP that was quoted origanally by TTE! yet nearly everyones torque figures seem to be well above what TTE say it should have been!

i wonder why this is?

Scott
Resurrected or not, good find. Never seen before.
Had to go back and read from the top.
The post I've quoted seems to echo your thoughts and my observations. Bhp in the right area. Torque above quoted. Interesting.
If that is the same Spit. Well played sir.

You've read itnin Moore detail than me missed that one.
@spit
@loadswine

You guys were there any information to add?

[jvanzyl]

What on earth was the c2 setup made out of??

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

[1979scotte]

What on earth was the c2 setup made out of??

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

Bigger turbo.
Have seen spits at ding day.

[dan944]

Those are some huge torque figures . Mines only 188lb/ft

[shnazzle]

Those are some huge torque figures . Mines only 188lb/ft

And it runs on stock ECU

.. And there you are with your fancy standalone

[dan944]

Those are some huge torque figures . Mines only 188lb/ft

And it runs on stock ECU

.. And there you are with your fancy standalone

How's that even possible.

And I think there's some Engine management envy here .

[shnazzle]

Those are some huge torque figures . Mines only 188lb/ft

And it runs on stock ECU

.. And there you are with your fancy standalone

How's that even possible.

And I think there's some Engine management envy here .

I keep saying this... The Toyota ecu really is something else. It's got cleverness hidden in it well beyond our understanding. It is immensely flexible and intelligent.
Much to our detriment,or if you can harness it, much to our benefit

[dan944]

Those are some huge torque figures . Mines only 188lb/ft

And it runs on stock ECU

.. And there you are with your fancy standalone

How's that even possible.

And I think there's some Engine management envy here .

I keep saying this... The Toyota ecu really is something else. It's got cleverness hidden in it well beyond our understanding. It is immensely flexible and intelligent.
Much to our detriment,or if you can harness it, much to our benefit

Imagine there was someone who actually knew the inside outs of it

[shnazzle]

What I want to know is how the TTE piggyback interfaces with it.
I reckon it you decode that, you're onto a winner

[shnazzle]

On topic:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
User Name:   HereComesTheWife
Name:   Helen
Mileage:   28K
Power Mods:   SP240 kit with ECUMaster EMU Black standalone mapped by RRR

Expected Power:   240 bhp
Actual Power:   230 bhp

Expected Torque:   225 ft/lb
Actual Torque: ?? (awaiting dyno plot) ft/lb

[dan944]

What I want to know is how the TTE piggyback interfaces with it.
I reckon it you decode that, you're onto a winner

Not possible. Toyota hires actual wizards to do their electricery.

Aaaaaaand I may have made a idiotic error. 188lb/ft at the wheels.

[lamcote]

Those are some huge torque figures . Mines only 188lb/ft

And it runs on stock ECU

.. And there you are with your fancy standalone

How's that even possible.

And I think there's some Engine management envy here .

I keep saying this... The Toyota ecu really is something else. It's got cleverness hidden in it well beyond our understanding. It is immensely flexible and intelligent.
Much to our detriment,or if you can harness it, much to our benefit

@shnazzle Do you think the standard ECU works against NA tuning but actually helps (up to a point obviously) forced induction?