Wideband test

Started by Tem, June 28, 2007, 08:19

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Tem

June 28, 2007, 08:19 Last Edit: January 1, 1970, 01:00 by Tem
Sure you can live without 500hp, but it\'s languishing.

Anonymous

#1
June 28, 2007, 14:24 Last Edit: January 1, 1970, 01:00 by Anonymous
I saw that, too.    LC-1/XD-1 rules.    s:) :) s:)

aaronjb

#2
June 28, 2007, 14:45 Last Edit: January 1, 1970, 01:00 by aaronjb
Indeed - it's what I have on my list to buy  s:) :) s:)  (XD-16)
[size=85]2001 Vauxhall Omega 3.2V6 Elite / 2003 BMW M3 Convertible / Dax 427 (in build)
ex-2002 MR2 TopSecret Turbo Roadster[/size]

kanujunkie

#3
June 29, 2007, 10:10 Last Edit: January 1, 1970, 01:00 by kanujunkie
oooooooppppppsss, my PLX buy wasn't so good then  s:( :( s:(
[size=100]Stu[/size]
[size=80]rip - C2 chargecooled roadster
now Subaru Impreza WRX STi with PPP
ex committee 2004-2009[/size]

Tem

#4
June 29, 2007, 10:53 Last Edit: January 1, 1970, 01:00 by Tem
Quote from: "kanujunkie"oooooooppppppsss, my PLX buy wasn't so good then  s:( :( s:(

I'm afraid it wasn't. If it can be off for +-1.0AFR, I don't think you should trust it too much.  s:? :? s:?

Another poor one is the Dynojet one. If it takes half a second to get a reading, imagine what happens when you're logging and go through few cells in half a second. You won't have the results in the proper cell and if you tune based on that, you're gonna have issues.


The article also raises another interesting point. The sensors do go bad over time, which affects the reading. If a sensor can't calibrate itself, how can you ever be sure if your sensor is still ok? Aged sensor combined with poor accuracy can be deadly. Say you're targeting 12.5 and end up with 14. BOOM!
Sure you can live without 500hp, but it\'s languishing.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions
Tags: