Window Tinting - Amendments to Legislation

Started by mph, January 22, 2004, 11:26

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

mph

During the early part of 2004, Section 32 of the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations will be amended to include "Window Tint Films", where such materials attached to the glass are capable of reducing the Visible Light Transmission of forward windows to below prescribed levels. These changes will be back-dated to become applicable from 1st January 2004.
This will effectively ban virtually all tinted films fitted to windows forward of the B-Post on any vehicle that is to be driven on UK roads.

The reason for these changes is the recent proliferation of vehicles that are excessively tinted. Some vehicles may be so heavily tinted that they present a real danger when used on public roads. The action being taken by the Government follows a fatality that occurred recently where a heavily tinted car was involved in a collision with a motorcycle and the window tints were held to blame due to the vision of the driver being impaired.
There is however, a recognised difference between "light window tints" which may be considered safe for road use and "excessively dark window tints" which are not.

There has also been a great deal of debate in recent years about the legitimacy of window tints that do not obscure the vision of the driver. A clear case has been argued that road-safe window tints do not actually conflict with existing regulations. The Department for Transport have argued however that Section 32 was always intended to cover materials attached to the glass, despite the fact that no mention of this is made in the Regulation itself.

The only solution remaining would be to amend the Legislation.
Consequently and in order to clarify the situation, the Government have finally decided to up-date the Regulations to specifically include Tinted Films since, in the view of the Police and the Department for Transport, this is the only way in which the problems of excessive tints can be remedied.

Unfortunately however, even tint films that may be considered to be safe for road use will now be viewed as in conflict with the Regulations, enabling the Police and Vehicle Inspectorate to take action against vehicle owners.

This has significant implications for the owners of vehicles that have window tints already fitted and also those that are responsible for installing or selling window tints.

Implications for the vehicle owner

After much discussion, a sympathetic Enforcement Policy has been agreed between the Department for Transport and The Glass and Glazing Federation to ensure that all vehicle owners that have had tints applied in the past may be dealt with fairly. This applies in particular where the infringement is with respect to tints that do not pose a significant threat to Road Safety, despite being in contravention with the amended Regulations.
In any event, after the date of the amendment to Section 32, the owner of a vehicle that has window tints applied forward of the B-Post could be challenged by either a Police Officer or by an Inspector from the Department for Transport's Vehicle Inspectorate, where their vehicle is noticed being driven on Public Roads.

Where such a vehicle is stopped and the window tints applied are such that the Visible Light Transmission level, when measured using an approved device falls to below prescribed levels, the following enforcement guidelines have been agreed with, and recommended, by the Government.
Above 30% Visible Light Transmission (Less Severe Window Tints)
The owner or driver of such a vehicle would be required to have the tinted film removed from the windows under the direction of either a Rectification Notice or a Delayed Prohibition Notice. A period of grace will apply for a limited number of days (normally ten) during which time the vehicle may be driven whilst the rectification work is to be completed.

In either case, the vehicle will need to be inspected by either a Police Officer or Vehicle Inspectorate Officer to confirm that the glass has been restored to a compliant condition. Prosecution is unlikely in such circumstances provided the vehicle owner complies fully.

Action that needs to be taken

All Businesses that have supplied window tints forward of the B-Post are being encouraged by the Government and the Glass and Glazing Federation to contact all of their previous customers to inform them of the changes to Legislation and to offer them a chance to have their vehicle rectified by having the front tints removed.



Reproduced with permission. Credit to Michael Canny. Originating source here.
[size=92]Martin[/size][size=75]
'06 Black MR2 Roadster
'03 Red Lotus Elise 111S
'01 Black MR2 Roadster SMT turbo[/size]

Anonymous

#1
Where's the B-Post?

Anonymous

#2
Quote from: "phil4"Where's the B-Post?

Its to post level with the back of the drivers door. The posts are A, B and C from the front to the back.

I think this is correct and I am sure if not I will be corrected!

  s:wink: :wink: s:wink:

mph

#3
In a four door estate:

A-Post - between front windscreen and front door
B-Post - betwen the front and rear door.
C-Post - between rear door and rear quarter window
D-Post - btween rear quarter window and boot-door.
[size=92]Martin[/size][size=75]
'06 Black MR2 Roadster
'03 Red Lotus Elise 111S
'01 Black MR2 Roadster SMT turbo[/size]

Anonymous

#4
Ta.

Anonymous

#5
Thanks for that.

Looks like yet another way to punish motorists

Anonymous

#6
Maybe so Craig, but I can see the point to be honest. My cousin had REALLY dark tints on his CRX (old shape. Nice little car!) and when inside, it was like driving a pair of blind man glasses. At night, it was almost inpossible to see where you were going.

I could see absolutely no purpose in it and even my cousin had it removed after about 4 months cos he couldn't see where he was going when he was returning home from work!

Anonymous

#7
No, I do agree with it, but so much money is spent on nicking "easy targets" such as motorists.

Anonymous

#8
And that I DO agree with you Craig. The motorist is a HUGE scapegoat for a million and one things and its just not fair. With that, I can't argue with you.

You're right, this does smack of more money grabbing, but I can see a safety issue to a certian extent to. But then so do you!!!  s:wink: :wink: s:wink:    s:wink: :wink: s:wink:    s:lol: :lol: s:lol:

mph

#9
<admin hat>
Can we stay on topic here guys and gals please. Feel free to continue general legislation or motorist bashing in another topic.
[size=92]Martin[/size][size=75]
'06 Black MR2 Roadster
'03 Red Lotus Elise 111S
'01 Black MR2 Roadster SMT turbo[/size]

Anonymous

#10
Sorry.........  s:oops: :oops: s:oops:    s:oops: :oops: s:oops:    s:oops: :oops: s:oops:

heathstimpson

#11
Does anyone know the current %tinting on the 2's glass as standard  s:?: :?: s:?:
Ex MR2 Roadster Turbo (seven years) now 997 Porsche Carrera 4 GTS

Tags: